closed off some production questions

git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freetel/code@1866 01035d8c-6547-0410-b346-abe4f91aad63

diff --git a/smartmic/SM1000-C/Change-Log-C.txt b/smartmic/SM1000-C/Change-Log-C.txt
index 27a2ecc624fc42b06726ebee6a8418aab016a197..57bbc72bd854cb7c82c0ebb97308612c76a1361b 100644 (file)
--- a/smartmic/SM1000-C/Change-Log-C.txt
+++ b/smartmic/SM1000-C/Change-Log-C.txt
@@ -344,18 +344,30 @@ The following should be added as items to list above & numbered. Too many places
 \r
        \r
 Questions:\r
-1.  SM1000 designed to be operated with 6-16V power supply. Would should recommend 9-15V. Should we recommend PS? Many will operate at 13.8V(rig supply). Do we risk ground loops, etc. using rig supply?\r
-2.  Should C37, C39, C40 be 50V? Or, only caps connected to VIN?\r
-3.  Are you going to supply speaker? Need J4?\r
+\r
+1.  [X] SM1000 designed to be operated with 6-16V power supply. Would\r
+        should recommend 9-15V. Should we recommend PS? Many will\r
+        operate at 13.8V(rig supply). Do we risk ground loops,\r
+        etc. using rig supply?\r
+       \r
+        DR 29 Sep 2014: tested with IC7200 at full power using same\r
+        12V battery as SM1000.  No problems observed, so I think we\r
+        are Ok for now.  Lets call this Ok for now (ie no specific rec\r
+        for PS) and see if any problems appear with Beta units.\r
+ \r
+2.  [X] Should C37, C39, C40 be 50V? Or, only caps connected to VIN?\r
+        DR 29 Sep 2014: Yes, good call.\r
 \r
 Production Questions\r
 --------------------\r
 \r
-1/ How do end users deal with RJ45 patch panel?  Hand solder?\r
+1/ [X] How do end users deal with RJ45 patch panel?  Hand solder?  DR\r
+   29 Sep 2014: RSB has answered this with patch panel concept (female\r
+   header and plug in wires)\r
 \r
-2/ Do we supply a loud speaker?\r
+2/ [ ] Do we supply a loud speaker?\r
 \r
-3/ What enclosure do we supply?\r
+3/ [ ] What enclosure do we supply?\r
 \r
 Rev C PCB layout notes\r
 ----------------------\r
@@ -376,7 +388,7 @@ Rev C PCB layout notes
 2/ L1, R10, C10, C12, C11, C13 close to U1 with direct connection to p20\r
 ====> Parts staged to do this when PCB routing done. RGB 09/27/14\r
 \r
-3/ Large labls for connectors and trimmers.  Maybe single letters or\r
+3/ Large lables for connectors and trimmers.  Maybe single letters or\r
 symbols so they can fit?  So user doesn't have to refer to schematic\r
 ====> Locations should be shown in "User Guide". There is a limit to component density and the number of labelling exceptions. If you want some specific labelling let me know. RGB 09/27/14\r
  \r
@@ -400,10 +412,11 @@ Risk List
        Action: Confirm value with Matt, decide on if we should \r
        downgrade to a bead\r
 \r
-2. [ ] Risk: Untested changes in schematic leading to a major problem.  \r
-       Action: David to review all change log entries above to\r
-       determine if any have been untested\r
+2. [ ] Risk: Untested changes in schematic leading to a major problem\r
+       in 100 Beta resulting in repair.  Action: David to review all\r
+       change log entries above to determine if any have been\r
+       untested.\r
 \r
-3. [ ] Risk; Software not ready when Beta hardware arrives: Action:\r
-       Specify min software load (e.g. configuration menus, SNR read\r
+3. [ ] Risk: Software not ready when Beta hardware arrives: Action:\r
+       DR Specify min software load (e.g. configuration menus, SNR read\r
        out, set up procedure)\r